photo
Jordan Sissel
geek

Fri, 26 Jan 2007

One anti-spam effort too easily defeated.

I see lots of times where people put their mailing addresses as "foo at bar dot org" in a hopeful effort to keep spammers from scraping your mailing address. Heck, mail archive systems often have (and are deployed with) options to obfuscate email addresses systematically, using the same pattern: foo at bar dot com.

All it does is hurt usability.

Googlng for "* at * dot *" clearly shows lots of matches. It also matches all of the following variants, due to google searches ignoring brackets and such in words:

  • foo at bar dot com
  • foo [at] bar [dot] com
  • foo (at) bar (dot) com
  • ... etc ...
Query, scrape, replace 'at' and 'dot' as desired. I now have 54 million email addresses. What now?

Seems like this effort only serves to have people fool themselves as well as to impede usability. It certainly won't protect you from spam. Why is this method used?

Comments: 2 (view comments)
Tags: , , ,
Permalink: /geekery/anti-spam-obfuscation-easily-defeated
posted at: 22:55

Search this site

Navigation

Metadata

Home About Resume My Code

Articles

ARP Security Dynamic DNS with DHCP OpenLDAP+Kerberos+SASL PPP over SSH SSH Security: /bin/false Week of Unix Tools Work Efficiency

Projects

fex firefox tabsearch firefox urledit grok keynav liboverride newpsm (FreeBSD) nis2ldap pam_captcha poor man's backup Solaris audio utility xboxproxy xdotool xmlpresenter xpathtool misc scripts

Presentations

Yahoo! Hack Day '06 Unix Essentials Vi/Vim Essentials

Tag Cloud

Calendar

< January 2007 >
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Friends

BarCamp Kent Brewster Tantek Çelik John Resig Wesley Shields Tyler Shields

Technorati